Ezra Pound’s “In a Station of the
Metro” is a short, two sentenced poem. Although this poem is very short, Pound
manages to let us in on his point of view in a very detailed way. Even with
just two lines, it consists of a lot of imagery, and his choice of words also
help us understand the meaning of the poem. The shortness of this poem also
fits perfectly with the topic he chose. As we read it, the words zoom by very
fast, the same way a subway flashes by quickly in an instant.
To start
off, the title already gives out the setting, a metro. What readers do not know
just from the poem itself is that this metro is located in Paris, France.
Moving on to the first line, Pound describes watching faces appear in a metro
station. From this line, it is unsure whether he’s writing from the point of view
of a passenger on the train itself, or if he’s walking on the platform. Either way,
we know that the station is packed full of people, as he writes “faces in a
crowd”. This lets us know that the station is busy. The word “apparition” means
that the faces come to him suddenly when he doesn’t expect it, and disappears
just as fast. He is somewhat surprised to see this many faces when he enters
the subway, and it briefly fills him with a sense of awe.
In the
second line, Pound simply writes “petals on a wet, black bough”. This is a
connection between man and nature. The man-made scene at the metro is linked to
the cycles of nature. Just as humans on a metro, flowers and trees constantly
move, grow and change. What he sees in that quick glance is never going to be
the exact same as they were the next second. Likewise, there are no two petals
that will ever look exactly the same, and wind blows, rain comes and go, and
new flowers blossom. Another example of the linkage between man and nature is
the words at the end of each line. The ‘ow’ in crowd doesn’t fully rhyme with “bough”,
but the two words move towards each other naturally.
It isn't
included in the poem, but readers get a sense that Pound is comparing the first
line to the second. “…the faces in a crowd [look like] petals…” is how readers
can read it. But, because those two words aren't included, it shows that this
poem isn't a simile, but a metaphor. Pound isn't saying that the faces he saw
look like petals, but they are
petals. As mentioned above, the setting is in Paris, and we usually imagine the
people there dressed fancily and looking nice. This could be why he compares
the people to petals. On the other hand, considering this poem is written in
Japanese haiku style, it is possible that he was thinking of Japan, which is
famous for its beautiful blossoming trees.
This
poem is an example of Imagist. Other poets who write this type of poetry often
use a lot of flowery words that captures the readers’ attention, and include
lengthy descriptions to get their point across. However, Pound manages to pick
out the best words needed to describe what he wants to say, and successfully
gets his point across with just two lines.
Your analysis was really in depth and made me see the poem deeper than what I initially saw it as. I didn't realize how much imagery Ezra Pound added in such short poem and the use of similar words that don't rhyme show strong similarity and make it known that nothing is exact. I don't understand how we can assume where the poem is taking place with just those lines. Think it is still hard to tell where this subway is at just by reading the poem.
ReplyDeleteAfter an initial reading of this poem, I had no idea how to interpret it or to make sense of it. However, you offer a great analysis and insight into this poem, which helped me gain a better understanding of it. By explaining how each line can be interpreted, I think you offer a great explanation on how Ezra Pound is able to use only two lines of imagery to paint a picture to the readers. I felt somewhat confused on how the last words of the lines are an example of the connection between man and nature, so I think you could explain a little more about that.
ReplyDeleteyour analysis show how clearly you have understood the text. I like the way you have explained both the lines of the poem and given your input. However i feel it lacks your input on the imagination part. There isn't a point on how you imagine the poem. So, I think you could add on there.
ReplyDelete